Charlie once had a fulnecky too.

This person gives me "young girl during the Salem witch trials who accused people of being witches to get them killed just for fun and attention, and never faced any repercussions or expressed any guilt for doing so for the rest of her life" vibes

that was the entire point of why she did it
she didn't "not understand the assignment", it was a calculated move to harm a trans woman and get a head-start on the far-right grift machine
it's why she broke the story on tpusa immediately

y'all remember that episode of king of the hill where peggy fails that quarterback that can barely write a sentence and the whole town gets mad at her?

propene smells and i and I thank god every day I get home that I didn't get exploded.

If she can cite God, then I should be allowed to cite the hallucinations that plague my many sleepless nights, whether they're relevant or not

"barely literate asshole" is one of the most lucrative career paths in the greatest country on earth

We have gone even further beyond "tied for fifth place at swimming" the new horizon of right wing grift is "turned in a shitty homework assignment"

2+2=Jesus ✊😔

someone fired up the outrage machine awful fuckin fast

It makes complete sense why TPUSA would back a person who wrote an bad anti-woke essay. Charlie Kirk originally got famous by writing bad essays to complain that schools were too liberal. His essays were published in Breitbart since the age of 17.

Just write a PhD desertation defending mein kampf, get it torn to shreds by peer review, go viral and walk into a cushy grift at this point. People who whine about DEI have a masterclass in failing upwards

Samantha Fulnecky essay controversy

In November 2025, a controversy arose surrounding University of Oklahoma psychology student Samantha Fulnecky's essay, and her characterization of the failing grade as an example of religious discrimination.

---

Edit

I edited her essay to create small paragraphs.

Here is the essay written by Samantha Fulnecky:

This article was very thought provoking and caused me to thoroughly evaluate the idea of gender and the role it plays in our society. The article discussed peers using teasing as a way to enforce gender norms. I do not necessarily see this as a problem. God made male and female and made us differently from each other on purpose and for a purpose. God is very intentional with what He makes, and I believe trying to change that would only do more harm.

Gender roles and tendencies should not be considered “stereotypes”. Women naturally want to do womanly things because God created us with those womanly desires in our hearts. The same goes for men. God created men in the image of His courage and strength, and He created women in the image of His beauty. He intentionally created women differently than men and we should live our lives with that in mind.

It is frustrating to me when I read articles like this and discussion posts from my classmates of so many people trying to conform to the same mundane opinion, so they do not step on people’s toes. I think that is a cowardly and insincere way to live. It is important to use the freedom of speech we have been given in this country, and I personally believe that eliminating gender in our society would be detrimental, as it pulls us farther from God’s original plan for humans.

It is perfectly normal for kids to follow gender “stereotypes” because that is how God made us. The reason so many girls want to feel womanly and care for others in a motherly way is not because they feel pressured to fit into social norms. It is because God created and chose them to reflect His beauty and His compassion in that way. In Genesis, God says that it is not good for man to be alone, so He created a helper for man (which is a woman).

Many people assume the word “helper” in this context to be condescending and offensive to women. However, the original word in Hebrew is “ezer kenegdo” and that directly translates to “helper equal to”. Additionally, God describes Himself in the Bible using “ezer kenegdo”, or “helper”, and He describes His Holy Spirit as our Helper as well.

This shows the importance God places on the role of the helper (women’s roles). God does not view women as less significant than men. He created us with such intentionally and care and He made women in his image of being a helper, and in the image of His beauty. If leaning into that role means I am “following gender stereotypes” then I am happy to be following a stereotype that aligns with the gifts and abilities God gave me as a woman.

I do not think men and women are pressured to be more masculine or feminine. I strongly disagree with the idea from the article that encouraging acceptance of diverse gender expressions could improve students’ confidence. Society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders and everyone should be whatever they want to be is demonic and severely harms American youth.

I do not want kids to be teased or bullied in school. However, pushing the lie that everyone has their own truth and everyone can do whatever they want and be whoever they want is not biblical whatsoever. The Bible says that our lives are not our own but that our lives and bodies belong to the Lord for His glory. I live my life based on this truth and firmly believe that there would be less gender issues and insecurities in children if they were raised knowing that they do not belong to themselves, but they belong to the Lord.

https://okcfox.com/news/local/students-zero-grade-for-citing-bible-in-essay-sparks-national-debate

Welcome to The Full Truth. The full truth is we're shamelessly exploiting you hogs with even less effort than even went into the essay to begin with. Which, if any of you actually read it,

Samantha Fulkirky

man I should just become one of these morons and get my bag. it seems like it wouldn't even be hard, just write a shitty essay where you espouse your terrible beliefs and then start a gofundme.

The chapo segment on this woman os great, Felix has some bangers. It also seems like this woman is being thrust onto the spotlight by her conservative local politics mother, but her essay reveals she's a terrible person in her own right

I hope whatever speech she performs is written by ChatGPT too. Realistically, they will just give her a better speech made by actual people (not her obv)

After the passing of Charlie Halfnecky it makes sense his replacement would be a Fullnecky

@groKKK@hexbear.net who gives neck better? Elon fulnecky or Charlie halfnecky?