879
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Grabthar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

OMG I did the same thing at a local pub. Thinking steak sandwich. Ordered one up. Pretty good! Went home, went to bed. Three hours later - gurgle - glorp - oh shit! The rest of the night it was coming out both ends. Feel fine after some sleep. Forget all about it. Three weeks later, at the same pub. Thinking steak sandwich again. Pretty good! Went home, went to bed. Sure enough, three hours later, lather, rinse, repeat. Feel fine after some sleep. Forget all about it. Three weeks later, go to the same pub. Thinking steak sandwich again, third time's the charm, right? My face when the pub had a sign up saying it was closed down for health code violations :/ To be fair, it was a good sandwich.

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

i thought my beer had expired one night because i had a terrible time on the toilet at 4am but i totally forgot i ate an entire wedge of blue cheese earlier

[-] bold_omi@lemmy.today 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's a shame that this is a re-post: I would like to know if the culprit was the tuna or the house sauce.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 35 minutes ago

Repeatedly off tuna without smell would be kind of hard to replicate.

My bet is on the sauce (like they kept reflling the same contaminated container)

Repeatedly getting sick from a work surface or employee hygiene seems sketch. up to 50% of the times and i'd be on board, but every time....

[-] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 13 points 3 hours ago

Plot twist: its because they never properly cleaned the prep area, the fridge was too warm and the employees didnt wash their hands regularly when switching between the cash register and food handling.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

This guy. Taking the bullet for all of us. A true scientist.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 8 hours ago

Could also be the owner that never washes his hands.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 43 points 10 hours ago

There was a cheapo Japanese restaurant downtown. Plastic everything. Went there for lunch a while back. Worst Bento box ever.

Six months later. Hmm, Bento box sounds good. Go to this Japanese restaurant. Halfway through the awful meal, remember I'd been there! Swore never to go back. Again.

This cycle repeated SIX times.

What broke it was the whole building burning to the ground because of a grease fire.

Point is... hmm... Bento for lunch sounds good.

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I had a similar experience involving pizza. Growing up I remember eating sbarro. I remember liking it. I know I liked the look of how shiny the pizza was. It reminded me of cartoon pizza.

Anyway, fast forward till I'm 30 year old man recruiting for the military. I was in malls walking around and I noticed the shiny pizza from sbarro. I ordered it. I ate it. It tasted like cardboard. I don't know if they changed their recipe, but chances are my taste buds just grew up and had better quality pizza over the years.

Well....I'm a slow learner and over the course of about 2-3 months I ended up eating sbarro like 3-4 times. Everytime I saw that shiny pizza, my brain had a nostalgia hit and I just went an ordered the 2 slice and a drink deal. After the last time, I wanted to throw it away but I forced myself to finish the cardboard pizza so I would remember how terrible it is.

I haven't had sbarro since.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago

The nice thing about pizza is that even when it's bad it's still pretty good.

[-] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 1 points 29 minutes ago

For real. I've had very few truly awful pizzas. I remember the bad ones. Looking at you "Marco's Pizza."

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I have such good memories from my time in Fukuoka and the bentos on sale after a certain hour, it really was dirt cheap and super good. If my memory serves right, it was around 200¥, 230¥, something like that. Approximately 2€ ! even less today with the yen having lost value.

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 8 hours ago

And that's why I came into the office drinking a bottle of house sauce.

[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 26 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Fun fact: This is not actually much different from the process of testing which foods trigger your IBS. After keeping the low FODMAPs diet, wherein you initially remove all possible triggers, you then test them one by one to see which ones you have specifically.

[-] poop@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago

This is me. Turns out basically everything gives me dhiarrea.

[-] hydroxycotton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Is your username inspired by this?

[-] poop@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

It is indeed!

[-] FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works 10 points 12 hours ago

I feel like a binary search method would work too

[-] groet@feddit.org 4 points 5 hours ago

A Binary search requires a ordered data set. Something like "if you react to X, you will also react to any X+1, X+2... X+n. Food is not ordered, you cant know if you react badly to bell peper because you reacted badly to whole grain wheat.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 47 minutes ago

Can't you easily reduce this to a compatible problem though?

Let's say you have the set of foods you suspect: red blue green yellow brown purple

You construct an ordered set from this by making the elements sets of foods such that each set is the one to its left plus any one more entry, the leftmost set is the empty one, and the rightmost is the one containing all your suspects:

{}, {red}, {red, blue}, {red, blue, green} .... {red, blue, green, yellow, brown}, {red, blue, green, yellow, brown, purple}

Now a check operation means eating the elements in the current set, if you get sick you go half way to the left border and update the right one, if you don't get sick you go half way to the right border and update the left one.

You should end up with the smallest set that makes you sick. Subtract the set to the left of it and you have the food that makes you sick left over.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 30 minutes ago

Yes, you can reduce it much faster assuming one food doesn't contaminate random other foods and it's not a workplace hygiene thing.

You could also ask for a bowl, dressing on the side, take it home, try the tuna, 12h try the dressing, 12h try the veggies.

[-] veleth@lemmy.wtf 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Not necessarily, but searching a data set that’s not ordered relies on an assumption that there’s a single thing you’re looking for.

If there are 10 ingredients, you get sick and you only take half next time, you need to be able to assume that there’s one set of 5 that doesn’t get you sick and one that does, and so on until you get down to the last ingredient.

It’s a good way to e.g. quickly find the right breaker in the box, because for each device/ socket there’s just one breaker that’s responsible, so flipping half of them gives you an actionable result

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

No, it's very different.

When you have multiple allergies/intolerances, starting at zero and then adding one thing at a time is a lot more efficient than removing one thing at a time.

Removing one thing at a time will create many false negatives, where you remove a hit but don't notice because you left another hit behind.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 33 points 15 hours ago

You mean the tuna and the house sauce weren't the two variables this guy tried isolating first?

He literally tried removing rice and all the vegetables before thinking "hmm, maybe it's the tuna or the sauce."

What a loon. He deserves every one of those awful shits.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 39 points 14 hours ago

Good science doesn't start with biases friend.

[-] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 hours ago

Good science will use previous norms, findings and general trends to provide a more useful starting point tho.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 17 points 14 hours ago

Good science starts from the body of evidence we already know, creates a plausible hypothesis, and then tests that hypothesis to see whether it can be disproven.

We don't say "hey, maybe gravity isn't real so to be unbiased I need to assume it's not and test every other possibility before determining what keeps making these bricks fall on my head every time I throw them up in the air"

No need to reinvent the wheel for every experiment.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Gotta do it in random order.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

probably the "inhouse sauce"

[-] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 135 points 18 hours ago

When I was an alcoholic I diagnosed myself with lactose intolerance. I’d have the Gatling Shits and wonder ‘Hmm was it the 14 tallboy cans of beer last night or the half liter of milk I had for lunch? Must have been the milk.’

So your lactose intolerant huh? That sucks. I used to wonder what food was causing my rectum to bleed so much, but I've diagnosed that it wasn't something to worry about until my 40s.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago

constipation can cause that, if shits are too hard too.

[-] almost1337@lemmy.zip 14 points 17 hours ago

Dealing with bleeding in my 40s after putting it off for a few years, don't recommend.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

I didnt get lactose intolerance until I was in my 30s. So weird that my body just decided "Nah, Im good with dairy products" all on it's own.

Really wish I would have discovered that earlier in life, before I developed my crippling cocoa pebbles addiction.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 42 minutes ago

Guess you only got a little trial period of lactase persistence, as a treat, but it ran out too soon.

[-] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Didn't even get a reminder to renew my subscription, dirty bastards.

[-] teft@piefed.social 15 points 14 hours ago

So weird that my body just decided “Nah, Im good with dairy products” all on it’s own.

That's actually the normal way your body is supposed to be. Most mammals lose their tolerance a little after they are weaned. Only some portions of humans retained lactase in their guts, generally groups that were pastoralists retained lactase and other groups didn't. It's why most east asian don't have lactose tolerance but Mongolians, some Sub-Saharan Africans, and Europeans do.

[-] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 hours ago

There's no way our bodies are "supposed" to be. There's the way they are and the way they were. Also some brave and dedicated individuals can apparently overcome lactose intolerance through exposure therapy. Basically they eat a bunch of dairy every day for weeks until their gut biome readjusts to digest lactose without all the discomfort. Apparently the gas and bloating are caused by the overgrowth of some bacteria and it just takes some time to find a new equilibrium so you don't get big blooms every time you eat lactose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SkabySkalywag@lemmy.world 36 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Pretty sure he's forgetting the constant variable, where x equals the times the cook uses the porta potty divided by the times he washes his hands.

(i.e division by zero = butthole undefined, or maybe infinite diarrhea).

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 82 points 19 hours ago

It’s fun to watch people self-diagnose food allergies.

[-] AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social 25 points 15 hours ago

In this case it would be an intolerance, and those you really do have to find on your own, unfortunately. And figuring it out can be extremely difficult.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 49 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

It's one of them.

Flawed assumption. It could be both. You'll need to eat there at least two more times to find out, assuming each trial yields 100% certainty.


~~Edit: I thought it should be obvious that we're taking them absolutely at their word that they've properly isolated these two variables because this experiment exists inside a joke and never happened. The whole point of the joke is that the methodology is god awful and completely unrealistic, so questioning that they've truly isolated the variables is pointless.~~


Edit 2: Wait, I totally misread the experiment setup. @TheYojimbo@lemmy.world is entirely correct that they've eliminated nothing if the experiment is totally defined by 8 bowls and 8 bouts of diarrhea. They're still converging on at least one cause, but there could still be others. My career is ruined.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

dude I've def ate food I loved the taste of but knew it was gonna make me shit liquid fire.

[-] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 12 hours ago
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

so good. like, gas station greasy ramen in red hot water broth, but so good

then so bad, so very bad

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
879 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

19645 readers
2268 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS