177
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 92 points 1 month ago

$1.5 billion

Could have fed and housed so many people with that money

Instead, she ate shit

pain

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 69 points 1 month ago

$20 billion

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) estimates that it would cost $20 billion to end homelessness.

You can easily get the rest from just pulling from the military or even better seizing the obscene wealth of the billionaire class and fix this overnight but noooooooooo billion dollar vanity projects.

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 43 points 1 month ago

At least my billion dollar vanity project, building Castle Von ThunderCastle, would provide countless jobs and a place to live for all those willing to join my ruthless terrorist organization

[-] miz@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

first put every real estate developer and landlord into a camp or they will ~~start~~ increase arming domestic paramilitary death squads

[-] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 34 points 1 month ago

Even ending homelessness for 1/20 people who are homeless would've been objectively better as a campaign strategy too

[-] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Nah it wouldn’t, like 95% of Americans give 0 fucks about the homeless

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

Off-topic, but that number is one of the things that made/makes me absolutely hate the billionaires in this world. People like Bezos, Buffett, or Musk could end homelessness or world hunger tomorrow while not even really noticing the hit to their wealth, but they all choose instead to spend it on destroying the planet instead.

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Homelessness and world hunger is the source of their power, they use it as leverage to force other people to enact their will. Ending hunger will diminish their power, and so they will never do it.

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 71 points 1 month ago

Trump gets 500 million, keeps half of it personally and wins the election.

Kamala gets three times that much, loses, and didn't even make her self unbelievably rich in the process.

Who's really the dumb one.

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 71 points 1 month ago

huh it's almost like this was the scam all along and winning was at best secondary

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 65 points 1 month ago

what, they don't have any math magicians at the NYT.

you spend 1.5 billion in 15 weeks by spending 100 million every week for 15 weeks.

I'm assuming they did something even less intelligent or beneficial than buying every American with a car a gallon of gasoline and a warm can of Pepsi.

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago

$5 to every American no questions asked and we actually fucling give it to you this time would unironically have been a better use of funds.

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 33 points 1 month ago

1.5 k to 1 million in key swing states, instead of paying hollywood turds, would have actually done something lol

[-] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 41 points 1 month ago

I would’ve settled for a large bag of Cheetos

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 43 points 1 month ago

instead he's in the got dang white house!

[-] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago

so I guess I got what I wanted

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 61 points 1 month ago

You could legit solve homelessness instead of flushing that down the drain to a bunch of ad companies

[-] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 39 points 1 month ago

And probably earn more votes. A lot more votes. No campaigning or anything, just funneling all the campaign funds into something that actually helps people. Social media would have done all the work. Sooner or later someone will remember the "bread" part of "bread and circuses" and they will rule completely unchecked. It will probably be terrible.

[-] Piment@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

I feel like we're so far past bread it would be viewed on an equal level as Elon giving a million to a random person for voting, a candidate that used their campaign funds to help people would probably get investigated and somehow disqualified from running.

[-] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

No, I think we will see it in our lifetimes. Not in any actually benevolent way, just a brief respite from the worst this world has to offer in exchange for the power to to literally anything.

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 58 points 1 month ago

I read earlier they actually finished up $20mil in debt lmao.

[-] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

"Woops i accidentally over drafted the account by 20 million dollars"

[-] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 month ago

Whomst among us...

[-] sourquincelog@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Also known as ONE DAY worth of spending lmao

[-] stink@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 month ago

In that same article some DNC spokesperson was like "we are separate from her campaign and we're very healthy financially now!"

So much proof they don't care about the election as much as their funding.

Also apparently her campaign is still getting donations... imagine the libs donating to her still.

[-] ihaveibs@hexbear.net 49 points 1 month ago

That is a comfortable lifetime's worth of money for thousands of people. Fucking gross

[-] Real_User@hexbear.net 48 points 1 month ago

Fwiw it probably did become a lifetime worth of money for a few thousand consultants

[-] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago

the-democrat 🎶 Springtime for MAGA and 'Murica! Winter for Gaza and Chad 🎶

PS I don't really know what's going on in Chad, it was just the single syllable country having the hardest time. I'll remove if I posted something offensive

[-] Babs@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago

Chad is in the tropics, I don't think they have winters there.

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago
[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago

The Cheneys too while you're at it... wait

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

she has pressed for more cash since the election

They're just doing the E1 episode

[-] Parsani@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago

So much spent on celebrity appearances too

[-] stink@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 month ago
[-] atyaz@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

Who could she possibly be convincing by bringing in Oprah? The wine moms are already voting for her.

[-] MarxOverflow@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 month ago

Well there were 2 assassination attempts on Trump after she gained the nomination so...

[-] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 month ago

Her faildayn were hard at work.

[-] notthenameiwant@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

Twice the 2008 Obama campaign for reference.

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
177 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13635 readers
760 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS