36
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Blaze@sopuli.xyz to c/casualconversation@lemm.ee

To discover communities: !communitypromo@lemmy.ca

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sergio@slrpnk.net 14 points 6 days ago

Whenever someone asks that, I say the following:

click here for a list of communities that are NOT politics, tech, or meme -related.

Most are currently active (except for the ones with a * which were less active last I checked)

GENERAL DISCUSSION / QUESTIONS

ART / PHOTOS

ANIMALS

COMICS / GRAPHIC NOVELS

ENTERTAINMENT

GENRES / STYLES

HISTORY

INFORMATION / KNOWLEDGE

OTHER

FEDIVERSE

FINDING NEW/GOOD COMMUNITIES ON LEMMY

click here for a list of meme communities

MEMES, SOCIAL MEDIA REPOSTS, AND HUMOR (NON-POLITICAL)

Most of these are currently active. (except for the ones with a * which were less active last I checked). Sometimes politics sneaks in but that's not the focus.

[-] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 4 points 6 days ago

This is really helpful thanks 😊

[-] m_f@discuss.online 6 points 6 days ago

It's not as big, but there's another community-discovery community on discuss.online: !newcommunities@discuss.online

[-] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Nice, I subbed to some I had missed!

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 days ago
[-] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago
[-] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 5 points 6 days ago

Bert Strips is great, but sadly there hasn’t been a post there in over a year.

[-] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

Nope but I scroll through them once in a while

[-] small44@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
[-] frankspurplewings@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Askouija It's stupid funny

[-] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

!askouija@lemmy.world is pretty funny

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 days ago

I always enjoying seeing !cocktails@lemmy.world

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago
[-] Ashtear@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

!antiquememesroadshow@lemmy.world. I love the concept, although I'm wondering if it's run its course with all of the low-hanging fruit being picked already.

[-] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

!crtart@lemmy.world is beautiful. Check it out. The artist took his own life and he deserves to be remembered and missed by more people.

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

2776 readers
116 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS