270
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 220 points 4 days ago
[-] Goun@lemmy.ml 106 points 4 days ago
[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 95 points 4 days ago

Makes download speeds great, but upload drops off a cliff

[-] Goun@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

You another fan behind your phone facing towards the router

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 4 days ago

not if you mount the fan on the ceiling, and let it lift up the air

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

...never stops buffering.

[-] Redfox8@mander.xyz 4 points 4 days ago

I sell the truth, that is my fan. Mits off! You now owe me $5.

[-] Gyroplast@pawb.social 56 points 4 days ago

I still have a soft spot for troll physics. Needs more magnets, though.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 11 points 4 days ago
[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 days ago

would you be interested in talking to a scientist?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah, but that makes the waves more choppy and stormlike which increases degradation of the equipment on the other side as the waves collide more strongly against it.

[-] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 days ago

What astounds me is despite being a crappy drawing, the person drew that fan with proper perspective and proportion.

[-] agegamon@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

NSFW

~~Only~~ Wififans 😳

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 6 points 4 days ago

The moving parts could disturb MIMO

[-] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 days ago

So better use a fanless Dyson fan? 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zxqwas@lemmy.world 102 points 4 days ago

It will probably reflect some of the radiation. Wifi reception will be poorer behind the aluminium and possibly better in front.

A cheapskates version of a directional antenna.

[-] raltoid@lemmy.world 43 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Indeed, although this type of thing was more common with older wifi generations, so I'm not surprised kids these days wont know.

For example: We cut the top off an old beer can, poked a hole and stuck it onto the antenna to have stable download speeds across a courtyard.

[-] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

I remember like 15 or 20 years ago the popular thing was printable papercraft doohickeys that you'd cut out and glue together with aluminum foil on the backside that were like little satellite dishes that mounted on the antennas that were supposed to boost/aim your wifi signal. I gave them a try, but if they made a difference it wasn't big enough to be noticeable.

[-] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 days ago

Reminds me of the diy antenna made out of copper wire, an empty CD spool and a single CD on its back. Those antennas could work as far as 1km if there was no obstruction, or 400m through light obstructions. It was awesome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Clearwater@lemmy.world 78 points 4 days ago

I unironically do something similar to this. In my area, the only options are a dogshit local WISP, Starlink/other satellite, or (where possible) cellular.

I am one of the "lucky" people who are able to use cell for my internet, however whether it's the cell company having a craptastic network, software/hardware bugs on the my customer equipment, or a combination of both, there is only ONE cell tower I can connect to which yields a useful connection.

All other towers result in the equipment failing to connect to the tower, connecting but failing to get an internet connection, or only yielding download speeds 5Mbit of less.

I have found that by shoving sheet metal around my ISP's equipment, I can quite easily block off the non-functional towers and ensure they're never connected to. I don't think speeds are any better, but it does help with reliability.

[-] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 days ago

I wonder if it's not only boxing the other towers but also boring the signal to the one you are aiming at, because you put a big mirror behind

[-] knightly@pawb.social 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Both to some degree, realistically. I used an old collander as a signal reflector for a wifi dongle on the end of a USB extension cable and was able to boost the signal up to about 4x, or maybe half the range of the purpose-built and highly directional Yagi antenna I eventually bought to replace that kludge.

[-] Clearwater@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I have tried that. I have a dish taken from a directional WiFi antenna. When placed behind the gateway, it sometimes increases speeds, sometimes hurts speeds, and sometimes does nothing. I found it a bit too inconsistent, and a bit too ugly, to be used permanently. If I had a proper mounting solution, I might have gotten it tuned just right, however at that point I would rather just buy and mount external antennas to hook into the gateway.

My exact deployment today actually doesn't even have anything behind the gateway. That is just because for my specific case, all the towers it can reach are within a roughly 90 degree field of view. To block the bad ones, I really only need to block off a few sections of the window it's sitting near.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago

Long live the Pringles cantenna

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

~~pringles can is too small for 2.4ghz cantenna,~~ it's near cutoff frequency but just barely, you need 10cm-ish diameter can or shorter 16cm-ish can

[-] Pencilnoob@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

I once made one of these with a bigger can and mounted it on an old 10' satellite dish. Managed to get Wi-Fi across several thousand yards without issue

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 25 points 4 days ago
[-] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 3 days ago

I can't tell if this is legit or an elaborate troll.

[-] roserose56@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 days ago

I did this back in 2010-13, to get better internet in my house! It was a video from a youtube, where he used cereal box with aluminum.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 days ago

I have put my router in a 4 m parabol antenna, with this the signal has also improved somewhat, it only prevents me from using the sofa that is next to the router.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

Keeps out the conspiracy-based posts and only lets facts through.

[-] LostXOR@fedia.io 17 points 4 days ago

This can actually be beneficial if your router is right at the corner of your house. The foil acts as a reflector for some of the radiation that would've been wasted, and thus improves the signal quality within your house.

[-] zout@fedia.io 49 points 4 days ago

To actually be beneficial as a reflector, the foil would need to be a specific distance from the antenna, which should be a certain fraction of the wavelength. Source: I used to make parabolic reflectors out of milk cartons about twenty years ago.

[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago

This is basic interference physics.

[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 36 points 4 days ago

I am 80% sure this is a net loss with modern mu-mimo radios, and it will absolutely trash your phy rate

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago
[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 4 days ago

MU-MIMO (Multiple-User Multiple In Multiple Out) does [math] to assist in directing signal to multiple clients at once via multipathing, which this reflector would fuck with the math of in (I think) a detrimental way. Regardless of its impact on that technology, higher-end wifi phy rates (the negotiated modulation rate between 2 stations, i.e. the wifi access point/router and your phone) would get shredded by having a reflector bouncing signal between the multiple antennas, forcing clients into artificially lower speeds for a [potential] marginal boost to gain.

This stopped being a helpful thing to do somewhere around the transition between wifi 4 and 5 (802.11n --> 802.11ac)

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

I remember going to a LAN that got its wifi from a local library via collander-boosting. Those were the days, and carrying around CRT monitors was sort of like exercise

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] three@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago
[-] Geodad@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In all different directions...

Back in my day, we used a Pringles can.

[-] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

When I was a kid we would connect a coat hanger to the TV to get the news from 2 towns over

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

We still do. It's a fun trick.

[-] Geodad@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

I still go war-driving from time to time. 🙂

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mastod0n@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Remember Pringles antennas? Same energy.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Remember windsurfers? You put them on the single antenna of your old linsky router.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
270 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

15838 readers
1520 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS