157
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 81 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Argentinian worker in one month: how come i help produce 100 milk bottles a day, yet receive 20 milk bottles per day marx-hi

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They'll just do the usual porky-happy retort that obfuscates the entire question by appealing to the abstract social nature of labor. If you're only at one spot on the assembly line and you contribute to a small part of the manufacturing of the commodity, it's a lot harder to measure how many commodities you make a day, since you never really make an entire commodity with your hands the way an artisan would. Someone milks the cow. Someone bottles the milk. Someone screws the cap on. Someone puts the label on. Someone makes the bottle. Obviously it's even more complex than that, but this is a simplified example. If a process of making a commodity is divided into 5 separate jobs, each worker only creates on average 20% of the commodity at a time. So if a given individual in that process does their job 100 times they really only "created" 20 commodities. And at this point the question becomes abstract enough for people to not really know exactly how much they're individually doing for the capitalist and it becomes harder for them to measure whether they're being paid the full value of their work or not. Intuitively of course most people know they aren't, because otherwise profit and hence surplus value/surplus product couldn't exist. And collectively the workers definitely are getting less than they give on average.

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

What part of Das Kapital did you get this from?

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's a tough question. I'm not quoting Marx above, I'm casually using intuition and memory. Honestly if I were strictly going off of Marx directly I wouldn't have talked so casually about the "full value of their work" since Marx draws a distinction between labor power (the commodity sold by the worker to the capitalist), living labor (work as it is actually performed) and dead labor (i.e. the products of past labor, including means of production). But yeah. This is mostly stuff you can find explained much better in Volume 1, Wage Labour and Capital, Value Price and Profit, and maybe a little bit of Volume 2.

If you want a full citation I'd have to put in some time and frankly it's the Saturday before Christmas and I'm feeling very lazy lol

[-] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 49 points 11 months ago

More like Russia in the 1890s. Dude is speedrunning the conditions for a communist revolution to the point im beginning to suspect he's a left accelerationist.

[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago

Plottwist, it is not Conan, his dead dog, who is speaking with him, but the ghost of ~~Peron~~ Che Guevara

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 49 points 11 months ago
[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago

ancaptain umm excuse me, didn't you read? I'm literally paying them in food!

[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 46 points 11 months ago

walks into a bank

Hi! Yes, I'd like to deposit my rotting milk and meat, please.

[-] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 45 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The crazy libertarian is resorting to payments in kind. I guess the next step for him will be building a barter economy and having taxes payable in corvée labor.

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

maybe Yanis Varoufakis really is onto something with his "Technofeudalism" book

Based on commentary I've heard from communists way more well read than me I'd say no, though it was what I thought of immediately when I heard of bringing back payment in kind. My imagination is informed that way based on reading of stuff in the Middle Ages like the Byzantines having a flexible tax policy after conquering Bulgaria, with the allowance of payment in kind.

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Byzantines having a flexible tax policy after conquering Bulgaria, with the allowance of payment in kind.

Interesting (I have nothing to add)

[-] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

the “Kubrick Stare” is one of Stanley Kubrick's most recognizable directorial techniques. A method of shot composition, where a character stares at the camera with a forward tilt to convey to the audience that they are at the peak of their derangement.

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 41 points 11 months ago

I feel like this is slavery with more steps.

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago

astronaut-1 astronaut-2

Always has been. it's just that instead of being a wage slave in exchange for money they're being a wage slave in exchange for commodities. "payment in kind" I believe it's called

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

No working for nothing is totally different to working for meat that went bad a week ago.

[-] buh@hexbear.net 38 points 11 months ago

Chuds when a libertarian gets elected: oh boy, I can’t wait to be paid in gold coins! so-true

Bosses when a libertarian gets elected: here’s a can of our finest Spam for an honest day’s work porky-happy

[-] thirtymilliondeadfish@hexbear.net 38 points 11 months ago
[-] Aryuproudomenowdaddy@hexbear.net 34 points 11 months ago

Who wouldn't want to be paid in vegetable stock.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 37 points 11 months ago

"Free labor is not a handout. Trust me."

[-] jaeme@hexbear.net 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"This level of optimization has not been done by any other runner in the category for quite a long time. Cementing Milei's run in the REDACTED any% category as the greatest of all time."

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago

His next decree will allow companies to decide the age of consent within their districts

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Retvrn to barter society (which was never real, read graeber's debt)

Milei really out here trying to swindle workers with LP-C exchanges

ancaptain "I will trade you 1 smoking-fish for 3 of your best worker" statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged

[-] SnowySkyes@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

There's no way this policy doesn't end disastrously.

[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

de-rhetoric

They'll be paid in rotting rat meat, I guarantee it.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

Bimetalism but you ran out of metal.

[-] Poison_Ivy@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago

Theres not going to be an Argentina anymore

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago

Vegans (and everyone else) in shambles.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

Sure, there's the freedom. But then there's also the shambles. An endless sea of shambles.

[-] OhHiMarx@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 11 months ago

The good news is that shambles are also a valid form of currency in Argentina

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

Alternating between shitting out of their doo doo asses from the lactose intolerance and not shitting for days due to of the lack of fiber.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

How long until it becomes standard practice to save on overhead by simply combining the workers foodpay into a homogenous, shelf-stable nutrient slurry?

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
157 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13556 readers
968 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS