876
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cap@kbin.melroy.org 100 points 2 months ago

There is a species of flying fish in the northwest Pacific region called Boeing interruptus that struggles to get airborne.

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

Careful! I've heard of what happens to Boeing whistleblowers.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

They sleep with the flying fishes

[-] Kallioapina@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago

Probably not flying, though.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

They fish with the sleeping flies?

[-] Lommy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

They fly with the sleeping fish.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is a common misunderstanding. They have no issue getting airborne, they do, however, have a habit of suddenly being not airborne, with catastrophic results.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

they do, however, have a habit for suddenly being not airborne

That's not true - I've heard they're too big to fall.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Holy shit, I completely fell for that until I read the replies.

Might be time for my medicine...

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 74 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

YEET THE FISH !!

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 50 points 2 months ago

Seeing these in choppy seas is interesting. You'll see a fish fly straight out the side of one wave, fly 100 feet through the air and right back into the side of another wave. Super unnatural looking.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 months ago

I mean, you probably should throw it like a paper airplane (with form, and not stupendously forcefully), or at least put it back in the water. It is a fish, it will asphyxiate if you just keep holding it.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

I have to imagine it has a greater capacity to hold its breath than the average fish, on account of their gliding and everything.

[-] StopJoiningWars@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago

It's just having a good time

[-] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

don't they glide for ridiculous lengths of time tho?

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Apparently the longest ever recorded glide is 45 seconds.

Fish don't have lungs, so the analogy is kind of busted, but some humans can hold their breath for 30 seconds, some 2 minutes, some 5 minutes, but overall it doesn't take long for brain damage/death to occur.

I'd guesstimate that a flying fish would be probably irrevivably dead after 3 to 5 minutes out of water.

I tried to look up more specifics on flying fish respiratory systems vs other fish back when I posted this, to see if they have measurably better ability to remain alive out of water for longer than other fish, but I couldn't find much.

[-] SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't think I ever processed that these are real and would have wings. It doesn't seem right. I don't like them.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 15 points 2 months ago

I feel like I want to show this to creationists because it would just break their brains a bit. They'd quickly go back and say god planned it, but I love the pure evolution here.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

Still more natural than birds - who tf ever thought we would fall for such an obvious spy trick?

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

I've seen those things once in my life while on a boat in the Philippines. Really quite something to experience in person.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 months ago

Fish says: "DO IT! aim at the ocean and DO IT!"

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

hmm....how many million years until we have proper flying fish? Maybe it's slower than land-air and land-water because the sky doesn't have as much food?

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

There are several major hurdles, and no particularly strong evolutionary drive to overcome them.

The first is breathing. Fish "breath" water. Shifting to air takes a huge reconfiguration. It also compromises their ability to process water.

The second is power. "Flying" fish are actually gliders. They build up momentum in the water before launching themselves into the air. They don't actually have the ability to flap and maintain their flight. Developing the muscles for this would likely compromise their swi.ing slightly. That would be a far bigger issue, compared to a bit of extra gliding.

A flying fish's goal is to break contact with an underwater hunter, before reentering the water. A steerable glide is more than enough of this. There is simply no pressure to advance it further.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Step 1:
Survive the humans

[-] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

Carry it around and make nrowwwn sounds like an airplane

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

My dad told me some story about how people would catch flying fish with fishing poles that had little gas engines on them. This would be in the 70s on an large Atlantic island.

[-] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

What part of the fishing pole was motorized?

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The reel. I heard this a long time ago. I fish a lot now but only fresh water so I can only guess what the deal was. Could be just to reel them in fast since they pass so quick. Could also be used to raise a net quickly. But they were rod with I think chain saw engines.

Now that I'm thinking about it, electric motorized reels are popular today for deep sea fishing. Maybe these were actually the 70s prototype to haul fish up 300m and catching flying fish is another story I'm mixing it up with.

Edit: I'm so sure I remember the cover of a fishing magazine that had like 3 people on the bank with these chainsaw rods to catch flying fish.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago
[-] Xttweaponttx@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

3 minute BBC earth vid of the little dudes. How have I never seen these things before! Incredible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUufx-FFGKU

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Nobody does nature as good as the BBC and Sir David Attenborough. Nobody.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
876 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

10842 readers
3123 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS