how to connect with voters who share their values but not all their liberal ideas

… what? If the voter in question is at odds with your ideas, that’s not someone who shares your “values.”

spoken with the billionaire Chris Larsen to discuss artificial intelligence

Cool, they’re progressing from overpaying useless media consultants in lieu of real organizing to overpaying useless AI consultants in lieu of real organizing.

Democrats: We've moved too far away from the working class voter

Also Democrats: Let's consult with tech billionaires, democratic pollsters, and NYT columnists

So they learned absolutely nothing? Killer.

They'll win the votes of the elusive 99% hitler electorate any day now. I suppose they don't mind trying since it is their preferred policy and if Trump second term is bad enough they might win the election with ability to pass reactionary conservative austerity legislature. Basically learning from Labor in UK.

Shes gonna lose harder than last time if they're dumb enough to run her again.

They sure used an awful lot of words to say

Please just have an actual democratic primary this time so you can lose again with less than 1% of the vote, in disgrace, and not drag all of us down with you again.

zero chance that this article mentions "genocide" or "Palestine" despite the polling showing it as ~~the dominant~~ a significant factor in her loss

EDIT: gonna dial down this claim until I can find some of the post-election posts

Abundance Agenda

sounds exactly like the kind of thing Kamala would feel the need to water down into "actually we're only fixing housing in one elite neighborhood in California".

She’s not winning the primaries, this site’s found its new boogeywoman

Liberals have learned nothing over the last 3 decades

"Republican, but less of an asshole" only gets you so far, even in a two party system where you are one of the two

She’s not making it far if she tries to run again. Her opponents will hammer her for losing the first time while offering better sounding options.

I want so hard to believe in the "abundance agenda," but it just doesn't work on its own. Ultimately, an economy only has so much productive capacity. Yes, YIMBY movements have their place; we should remove irrational barriers to new housing construction like wasteful single family zoning. But the real problem is one of income and wealth inequality. There are only so many workers, so much investment capital, so many productive resources in an economy. It costs money and materials to build homes. If all the wealth is piled at the top, those resources will go towards the whims of the wealthy. If wealth is broadly shared, then those resources will go to the needs of the many. Instead of people learning to become carpenters to build homes for regular people, they study to be shipbuilders to build yachts for the ultra rich. Instead of mills churning out wood, concrete, and steel for ten modest family homes, those resources go to build a single large mansion for one wealthy family. With all the wealth piled at the top, the rich can outbid everyone else for any of the resources needed to build homes. You cannot solve the housing crisis without tackling wealth and income inequality first.